Nordic Aquafarms announces leadership transition for Belfast project Tuesday, July 5, 2022

Maine Attorney General dismisses complaint against City of Belfast Saturday, February 19, 2022

Maine Attorney General files complaint against City of Belfast; Nordic Aquafarm named as intervener-defendant Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Growth of Maine’s aquaculture industry sparks conversation about carbon footprint Monday, May 17, 2021

Belfast Council to discuss Water District real estate transaction with Nordic Aquafarms this evening Wednesday, April 21, 2021

Nordic Aquafarms stays the course for Belfast salmon-raising facility, opponents to take their case again to court Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Belfast Zoning Boards of Appeals to begin Nordic Aquafarms hearings Feb. 18 Wednesday, February 17, 2021

State approval of Belfast salmon farm is appealed; city Planning Board OKs project Sunday, December 27, 2020

Belfast aquaculture project puts intertidal ownership into question Monday, December 7, 2020

Board of Environmental Protection to begin deliberating over Nordic Aquafarm’s indoor salmon project Tuesday, May 19, 2020

PORTLAND — Thursday morning, Sept. 8, attorneys representing the City of Belfast, state government, private citizens and Nordic Aquafarms, Inc., will gather at the Cumberland County Courthouse in Portland to present oral arguments concerning an appeal filed to the state’s highest court of a 2021 Waldo County Superior Court Belfast salmon farm decision.

Meanwhile, on Sept. 1, Waldo County Superior Court Justice Robert Murray handed down another decision on a related Nordic Aquafarms, Inc. lawsuit, dismissing a request by the nonprofit Upstream Watch for a court review of Belfast city municipal proceedings on the permitting of the aqua farm applications.

The Sept. 8 Maine Supreme Judicial Court hearing on Jeffrey R. Mabee et al. v. Nordic Aquafarms, Inc., et al is scheduled for 10:40 a.m., and can be heard here: courts.maine.gov/courts/sjc/arguments-stream.html

The dispute is over the path of the industrial pipes for Nordic Aquafarms that are to transport water from the indoor salmon plant with discharge into Penobscot Bay. 

“At issue in this appeal are (1) the ownership of the intertidal land; (2) the interpretation and enforceability of a restrictive covenant in a deed in the chain of title to the land; and (3) the validity and enforceability of a conservation easement on the land,” according to the court summary.

In 2020, the City of Belfast exercised eminent domain authority in an attempt to provide saltwater pipeline access to the large-scale salmon farm from Penobscot Bay shoreline. The three pipes would run underground and be used for both intake via two smaller pipes, as well as discharge of treated water via one larger pipe.

Opponents to the Nordic plan said that a conservation easement on a swath of intertidal mudflats prevents Nordic from crossing the property with its pipes. 

Nordic’s intent to build a land-based aquaculture facility was first unveiled in January 2018.

Nordic Aquafarms, Inc., had proposed to develop its enclosed salmon farm project in two phases over 5 or more years.

Total production capacity at build-out is estimated to be 72,732,000 pounds (33,000 metric tons) of salmon per year.

Phase 1 involves the construction of about 414,450 square feet of buildings.

Phase 2 involves the construction of about 392,804 square feet of buildings; each phase involves rearing and processing a similar amount of salmon.

The buildings are to consist of:

six module buildings, each 112,223 square feet in size;

two smolt buildings, 53,947 square feet;

a wastewater treatment plant, 20,056 square feet;

a processing building, 24,096 square feet;

a central utility plant, 18,998 square feet; 

Opponents also have another related case before the Maine Supreme Judicial Court — also referred to as the Law Court — appealing Maine’s Board of Environmental Protection processes when approving state permits for the project. Hearings have yet to be scheduled on that lawsuit.

Upstream is appealing three BEP permits issued in 2020.

Justice Murray dismissal of Upstream Watch petition

On Sept. 1, Justice Robert Murray dismissed the request by Upstream Watch for a court review of the Belfast Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals actions.

Upstream Watch asked Waldo County Superior Court to vacate the ZBA’s refusal to hear an appeal challenging the Belfast Planning Board’s  five permits granted to Nordic Aquafarms.

Belfast and Nordic Aquafarms had maintained that Upstream Watch lacked standing for such a court review.

But Justice Murray wrote in his decision that Upstream Watch had failed to present evidence necessary for standing to the ZBA.

“The Court determined that Upstream’s appeal form does not indicate that it or any of its members possess land that is ‘directly or indirectly affected’ by the Planning Board’s decision nor does it indicate that Upstream or any of its members possess land that abuts the land that was subject of the permits,” wrote Murray, in his decision.

The ZBA did not commit an error of law, he said.

Reach Editorial Director Lynda Clancy at lyndaclancy@penbaypilot.com; 207-706-6657

Open to all, supported by readers. Become an online member today:

Welcome and thank you for your support.

To manage your account, just hover and click on your name above.

Thanks to our readers and especially our supporters who help to keep PenBayPilot.com an open and accessible community hub.

Your support is even more critical during rapidly changing times, when communication is paramount. While we work hard to keep you informed about the Midcoast community, how citizens cope and thrive, we need your help, too.

We are grateful to those who already participate. If you are not a supporter, please consider becoming one today. Join for as little as $2.99 per month and support local journalism on a community hub that serves everyone.